Transfusion Confusion
& Other Questions About Faithfulness
Series Title: Life Lessons from
Leviticus? (For
More In This Series )
A Sermon By
Jim Hammond from Leviticus 17
I want to read to you a letter
written by a Jehovah Witness Mother:
My son
was … bright and promising and a true servant of Jehovah. He dreamed of
going to Bethel to serve Jehovah more fully. He prepared for meetings on
his own, pioneered during summer breaks, handled the microphones at the
Kingdom Hall, and timed the student talks for the Ministry School
Overseer. He even gave talks at assemblies. We were so proud!
He was 15
years old and in the 9th grade when he and another young Witness were in a
terrible auto accident. The other boy was driving my son home from the
Sunday meeting when he raced the car, lost control and flipped. I was a
faithful Witness for 29 years, and my husband and I trained our son to
refuse blood transfusions. He told the ambulance drivers, "No blood!" and
he said it again at the first hospital before he became unconscious. When
he was air lifted to the trauma center, he was immediately transfused
because he was unconscious and a minor.
By then,
however, a lot of time had passed and there had been severe internal
bleeding that had damaged his heart and other organs. When we arrived at
the trauma center, the doctor told us that he had little chance of
survival without blood transfusions, and that they had given him several
units when he arrived. This angered my husband a great deal but I said
nothing. Secretly, I had hoped the doctors would give him blood despite
our wishes if a transfusion could save his life. The doctor said they
restarted his heart twice and that gave us a glimmer of hope but twenty
minutes later, with tears in his eyes, the doctor said they couldn't
restart his heart a third time – he had died.
My
husband and my two other sons and I cried and cried and cried. I have
never known such anguish and physical pain! I wanted to die. The pain was
unbearable. I kept thinking, "Would he have lived if he got blood at the
first hospital?" A spiral of profound change began in my life.
When you
see your child lying wrapped in a white sheet, their pale lifeless face -
there is no comfort. I will be forever carrying that picture of my son in
my mind - wearing the face of death. No words can touch that place where
your heart is dying. The hope of the resurrection means nothing when you
can't see or touch the living-breathing child that filled your life with
joy. Never seeing them smile at you, laugh with you, or give you a hug
ever again in the days to come. Never hearing them say, “I love you”
again. I've suffered pain, but nothing compared to the pain of losing my
beloved son. Your whole body becomes sickened with the most horrible
physical pain one can feel. I've suffered pain, but nothing compared to
the pain of losing a child.
I pray
that any Jehovah’s Witness who has children and reads this will never have
to face such a loss such as mine. A loss that can be prevented if they
have a true understanding of what the Watchtower Society is asking them to
sacrifice. After my son had died, I realized my nagging doubts about the
Watchtower’s blood policies needed to be fully investigated. Hadn't I
just lost a child for these purportedly God given laws I had lived by for
29 years?
I soon
learned that over the years the Witnesses have changed many teachings
about blood and that the Governing Body was about to change more of its
blood doctrines. Why are some parts of blood permitted when others are
not? Where did they find this in the Bible? In addition, if the Bible says
nothing about transfusions, how can the Governing Body say with certainty
that blood transfusions are wrong in Jehovah's eyes? How could I forgive
those men for my son's death? In my opinion, the men of the Governing Body
have the blood of many innocents on their hands. They who taught us
falsely in God's name are accountable to him.
My heart
is completely broken - my child is dead. I beg of you who read my story,
don't let this happen to you. Educate yourself now before you are faced
with a similar tragedy. If any child can be saved by their parents
thinking now rather than after they lose their child, perhaps my son's
death will not have been for nothing.
[1]
I serve on the newly formed bio ethics committee at
the Verde Valley Medical Center. At our last meeting together we had a
representative from the Jehovah’s Witnesses Phoenix Hospital Liaison
Committee come and address the bio ethics committee. This was an effort
to educate those of us on the committee over the extremely controversial
ethical and legal issues as it relates to the personal rights of a
Jehovah’s Witness, or the rights of a minor when they are in need of a
blood transfusion or medical treatment that require blood products.
It was a very interesting meeting to say the least.
It was tense talking about life and death issues for these doctors, as you
can imagine. For the Jehovah’s Witness, receiving a blood transfusion is
anathema. For the Doctor, not giving a blood transfusion sometimes feels
like committing homicide, and one Doctor said so heatedly to the
representative. The Jehovah Witness responded that giving a blood
transfusion without consent is like committing medical rape. The doctors
and nurses alike are frustrated because although they can understand a
patient’s personal religious rights, they are frustrated by what they
see. There is incredible pressure placed on the Jehovah’s Witness Church
places on the Jehovah’s Witness patient when they are in a hospital and in
need of such treatment to live. This organization views it as support.
The medical staff view it as power coercion.
Today, in our series on Life Lessons From Leviticus,
we come to one of the passages that the Jehovah’s Witnesses often site for
the religious reasons why they must refuse a blood transfusion even if it
means losing one’s life.
I listened to the representative’s presentation. He
used three passages from scripture. Most people can simply ignore their
position as weird and leave it at that. But I can’t simply write off as
weird an interpretation of scripture. I have to find out what an accurate
interpretation requires. After all, I admire someone who is willing to
die for convictions they believe are non negotiable. Even if I think the
Jehovah Witnesses are misguided, I admire their desire to remain faithful
to what they believe. When the representative sited three passages of
scripture, although some of the medical community might just write this
off as weird, if I am to disagree with their position, I must justify in
my own mind and heart why this is a bad interpretation of scripture,
because I also see the Bible as the authoritative truth for my life. One
thing was made very clear. The representative was clear to state that
their refusal to accept blood transfusions is on religious grounds and not
on medical grounds.
Here are the verses he sited for the decision of the
Governing Body of the Jehovah’s Witnesses to forbid any medical treatment
that includes whole blood products.
Genesis 9:3-5 Everything that
lives and moves will be food for you. Just as I gave you the green
plants, I now give you everything. 4"But
you must not eat meat that has its lifeblood still in it.
5And for your lifeblood I will surely demand an accounting. I
will demand an accounting from every animal. And from each man, too, I
will demand an accounting for the life of his fellow man.
Leviticus 17:13-14 " 'Any
Israelite or any alien living among you who hunts any animal or bird
that may be eaten must drain out the blood and cover it with earth,
14because the life of every creature is its blood. That is why I
have said to the Israelites, "You must not eat the blood of any
creature, because the life of every creature is its blood; anyone who
eats it must be cut off."
Acts 15:28-29
28It seemed good to the Holy Spirit and to us not to burden you
with anything beyond the following requirements:
29You are to abstain from food sacrificed to idols, from blood,
from the meat of strangled animals and from sexual immorality. You will
do well to avoid these things. Farewell.
According
to the Jehovah’s Witnesses, they are forbidden even to store their own
blood, for a scheduled surgery. Once it is outside of the body, it is
unacceptable to be reintroduced to the body.
However, it was interesting to note, that blood
proteins, Albumin, Globulins, and all clotting factors derived from blood
were made matters for individual conscience, though whole blood products
like Red Cells, white cells, plasma, or platelets were absolutely not
acceptable.
That’s a curious detail all by itself and I was
interested to know why, although I never learned why.
This
inconsistency confirmed my conviction that a legalist cannot be 100%
consistent.
Not
much more was said explaining the verses. It was assumed the verses
justified their position. But what I couldn’t help but note immediately
was this. Every verse had to do with food laws, not medical practices.
And in view of our recent study on the biblical food laws about clean and
unclean foods from Leviticus and the New Testament. What did we learn?
We learned that Jesus declared all foods clean. So my awareness was our
freedom now to eat foods that were formerly forbidden in Old Testament
laws. That still leaves us with the Acts 15 passage, that’s in the New
Testament.
I
decided to stick around after the meeting and ask the representative to
clarify why the Jehovah’s Witnesses interpret the Bible on these passages
the way they do, when these laws were food laws and not about medical
practices. The representative answer was this. “If you were in the
hospital with a broken jaw and your mouth was wired shut, how would they
feed you?”
I
knew where he was going with this, so I said “Intravenously.”
He
said, “Right”.
He
added, “If you agreed not to drink any alcohol, would taking it
intravenously mean you kept your agreement?”
The
obvious answer to the leading question, was “No.” I could see
where he was coming from making the connection
between food, and blood as food, although in reality,
blood in the veins never enters the digestive tract like food does.
Just in case, you think this case has nothing to do with your life, and
you don’t care what the Jehovah’s Witnesses think, let me say this. Don’t
tune yourself out. I think you will discover that understanding Leviticus
17 has more practical implications than merely
being able to articulate how you believe differently than some aberrant
religious group. There are other practical implications here.
Let’s read a very difficult and seemingly obscure chapter of scripture,
Leviticus chapter 17. It is so obscure that when I went to a sermon
website that hosts thousands upon thousands of sermons, and when I entered
as a search criterion, “Leviticus 17”, the result was “Sorry your search
resulted in no matches.” Not preacher had preached a sermon from this
chapter alone. After you hear my message today, you will think I
shouldn’t have either. But I hope on the contrary that you will be glad
that I did. It is my belief that every page of scripture is a gold mine
if you understand it properly.
Here’s the focus for Leviticus 17. And I want you to notice that the
truths we ponder today go far deeper than the mere questions regarding the
issue of “Transfusion Confusion”.
Focus: We must be careful to give no devotion or allegiance to
anything that competes with God for our heart’s full devotion.
Leviticus 17:1-16
The Lord said to Moses,
2"Speak to Aaron and his sons and to all the Israelites and say to
them: 'This is what the Lord
has commanded:
3Any Israelite who sacrifices an ox, a lamb or a goat in the camp
or outside of it
4instead of bringing it to the entrance to the Tent of Meeting to
present it as an offering to the Lord
in front of the tabernacle of the Lord--that
man shall be considered guilty of bloodshed; he has shed blood and must be
cut off from his people.
5This is so the Israelites will bring to the Lord
the sacrifices they are now making in the open fields. They must bring
them to the priest, that is, to the Lord,
at the entrance to the Tent of Meeting and sacrifice them as fellowship
offerings.
6The priest is to sprinkle the blood against the altar of the Lord
at the entrance to the Tent of Meeting and burn the fat as an aroma
pleasing to the Lord.
7They must no longer offer any of their sacrifices to the goat
idols to whom they prostitute themselves. This is to be a lasting
ordinance for them and for the generations to come.'
8"Say to them: 'Any Israelite or any alien living among them who
offers a burnt offering or sacrifice
9and does not bring it to the entrance to the Tent of Meeting to
sacrifice it to the Lord--that
man must be cut off from his people.
10" 'Any Israelite or any alien living among them who eats any
blood--I will set my face against that person who eats blood and will cut
him off from his people.
11For the life of a creature is in the blood, and I have given it
to you to make atonement for yourselves on the altar; it is the blood that
makes atonement for one's life.
12Therefore I say to the Israelites, "None of you may eat blood,
nor may an alien living among you eat blood."
13" 'Any Israelite or any alien living among you who hunts any
animal or bird that may be eaten must drain out the blood and cover it
with earth,
14because the life of every creature is its blood. That is why I
have said to the Israelites, "You must not eat the blood of any creature,
because the life of every creature is its blood; anyone who eats it must
be cut off."
15" 'Anyone, whether native-born or alien, who eats anything found
dead or torn by wild animals must wash his clothes and bathe with water,
and he will be ceremonially unclean till evening; then he will be clean.
16But if he does not wash his clothes and bathe himself, he will be
held responsible.' "
As
you can see, the context of this chapter is about allegiance to God. At
least at that point the we and Jehovah’s Witnesses can agree. But let’s
attempt to understand better what’s going on here so that we know what God
wants from us. Are there any Life Lessons from this Leviticus Chapter for
us? I believe so, even though it needs to be understood through the
fulfillment of the New Covenant.
Rule Number 1 in scripture interpretation is this…
I. Understanding the Context
A. What Was Commanded
1. Sacrificial Animals Could Be Butchered Only At the
Tabernacle (vs. 3-4)
Why were the
Israelites prohibited from sacrificing outside the Tabernacle area? God
had established specific times and places for sacrifices, and each
occasion was permeated with symbolism. If people sacrificed on their own,
they might easily add to or subtract from God’s laws to fit their own
life-styles. Many pagan religions allowed every individual priest to set
his own rules; God’s command helped the Israelites resist the temptation
to follow the pagan pattern. When the Israelites slipped into idolatry, it
was because “the people did whatever seemed right in their own eyes”
(Judges 17:6).[2]
T or F This Command Was Permanent
Although the end of verse 7 says, This is to be a
lasting ordinance for them and for the generations to come. The answer
to this True/False statement is actually tricky. Technically, the
statement “This Command Was Permanent” is False because although it is
eternally true, and therefore permanent, that we should never worship
false gods, the specifics on this particular command was temporary. The
reason for the command was a permanent reason (don’t worship false Gods),
but the way to avoid it was different before the conquest and after the
conquest of the promised land. Before the conquest people were not even
allowed to butcher any sacrificial animal to eat it outside the
Tabernacle. By the time frame of Deuteronomy, just before entering into
the land of promise, their more permanent dwelling place, this specific
injunction had already been modified.
Deut. 12:20-25 When the Lord
your God has enlarged your territory as he promised you, and you crave
meat and say, "I would like some meat," then you may eat as much of it as
you want.
21If the place where the Lord
your God chooses to put his Name is too far away from you, you may
slaughter animals from the herds and flocks the Lord
has given you, as I have commanded you, and in your own towns you may eat
as much of them as you want.
22Eat them as you would gazelle or deer. Both the ceremonially
unclean and the clean may eat.
23But be sure you do not eat the blood, because the blood is the
life, and you must not eat the life with the meat.
24You must not eat the blood; pour it out on the ground like water.
25Do not eat it, so that it may go well with you and your children
after you, because you will be doing what is right in the eyes of the Lord.
It
was no longer feasible for the entire nation to come only to one center of
worship to slaughter the sacrificial animals. Many would have had to
eliminate these animals completely from their diet if that were the case.
That was not the point. Avoiding pagan practices was the point. We will
get to which practice to avoid next.
2. Blood Must Not Be Eaten (vs. 10-14)
I’m sure that upsets many of you. Any vampires out
there? This command may sound strange to you, but we now forget how much
our own abhorrence to something is related to how the Bible has shaped our
culture and thoughts. The reason nobody is tempted in this area anymore
was because God’s law completely eliminated this from our mainstream
culture. We do not feel any pressure from our culture to participate in
this behavior because this behavior has been effectively eliminated as a
cultural norm.
What if blood was your favorite meal? I’ve never had
it, but I understand “blood sausage” is very popular in some places, and
with some people. Most of this seems irrelevant to most of us who don’t
care to eat blood, and don’t care if we have to give up blood sausage.
And I will explain why I disagree with the Jehovah Witnesses on the
“Transfusion Confusion,” but even that question doesn’t seem pressing for
most of you. Hang on, we are getting to some principles that apply to
every one of us, and every one of us today.
A.
Why These Commands
Let’s answer this question in reverse order as it appears in the text.
First, the explicit reasons given for not eating blood is given. There
are only two reasons spelled out here for not eating blood.
1. The Explicitly Stated Reasons:
(a.) Respect for life (vs. 11 & 14)
(b.) Respect for the Atonement (vs. 11)
2. The Underlying Reason
(a.) The Seduction Of False Worship
The purpose for the commands in this chapter was to
cut off occasions of idolatry and to prevent the people's usurpation of
the priest's office.
The underlying reason for what seems like obscure commands was the
seduction of pagan worship practices.
Ancient Pagan Worship Practices
7They must no longer offer any of their sacrifices to the goat
idols to whom they prostitute themselves. This is to be a lasting
ordinance for them and for the generations to come.'
In other words, it is
never appropriate to offer your worship allegiance to false gods. Some
translations, by the way, translate the term “goat idols” with the phrase
“goat demons”. These are not merely systems of humanly made up stone
idols, representing human ideas and systems. This is the active
participation with real demonic powers. That is why the eating of blood
was to be treated as harshly as murder (vs. .4). This was real spiritual
prostitution. This context becomes clearer and clearer as you continue to
read. Consider
Leviticus 18:1-5 The Lord
said to Moses,
2"Speak to the Israelites and say to them: 'I am the Lord
your God.
3You must not do as they do in Egypt, where you used to live, and
you must not do as they do in the land of Canaan, where I am bringing you.
Do not follow their practices.
4You must obey my laws and be careful to follow my decrees. I am
the Lord your God.
5Keep my decrees and laws, for the man who obeys them will live by
them. I am the Lord.
Chapter 17 was written to differentiate the Israelite practices from the
pagan practices. Remembering that there are no chapter breaks, or
numbering of verses and paragraphs in the originals. Chapter 17 leads
right into the thoughts of 18. This whole section is about the drastic
confrontation of horrific pagan culture, a culture that so saturated even
the Israelites thinking that the thought of participating in these pagan
practices was very seductive. This was a very real temptation for these
Israelites.
The
reason NO sacrificial animals could be killed away from the Tabernacle was
to remove the temptation completely and bring correction to the terrible
pagan influences.
If you aren’t sure this
is what was the problem, check this out
Leviticus 19:26-28
" 'Do not eat any meat with the blood still in it.
" 'Do not practice divination or sorcery. 27" 'Do not cut the hair at the sides of your head or clip off the
edges of your beard.
28" 'Do not cut your bodies for the dead or put tattoo marks on
yourselves. I am the Lord.
II.
Clearing The Confusion
1)
If the no eating blood laws were food laws, Jesus declared all
foods clean.
2)
(But then why the Acts 15 reference to abstaining from blood? You
can imagine how offensive this would be to Jews. This was a consideration
for unity, in the context this is clear. Again, the offense is clearly
connected with pagan idolatrous practices. It is not inclusive of medical
practices to save life
3)
Orthodox Jews would have something to say about it, if the
injunction was a blanket statement that covers even medical practices.
But no orthodox Jew who still attempts to follow the Torah makes any
connection between these blood laws and blood transfusions. It is only
the Jehovah’s Witnesses who believe this interpretation. And the reason
for it is that their authority isn’t the Bible really, but “the Governing
Body” which determines for them what they must believe.
·
The protestant reformation taught us something the Jehovah’s
Witnesses have yet to learn. The protestant reformation was a movement
that recognized the error of asserting church authority over the Authority
of the Bible. One of the major differences between ourselves and the
Jehovah’s Witnesses, or any cult group is this. We see the Bible as our
ultimate authority for truth. The Jehovah’s Witnesses may say this, but
really it is their “Governing Body” who has the ultimate authority for
truth. In their system you cannot question the Governing Body who has the
ultimate authority in all matters including the “correct” interpretation
of the Bible. Any group that asserts their “church authority” as greater
than Biblical authority are setting themselves up for dangerous beliefs
and practices. Let God’s Word be the authority of your life.
4)
The text explicitly says the basis for the law. The law upheld
reverence and respect for life, because life is in the blood. Let me ask
you a question: Which choice demonstrates the most respect for life in a
life or death decision about a medical blood transfusion? The choice to
transfuse and save life where possible? or the choice to let someone die
because of a suspicious interpretation of this verse? I believe greater
respect for the Creator, and Life, and the truth that Life is in the
Blood, is demonstrated when out of a high view of life, one accepts a life
giving transfusion. Does this use of blood, devalue life or value it?
Does this use of blood devalue the atonement, and the picture of
sacrifice, or honor it?
5)
Jesus knew how to prioritize the truths in the law. He prioritized
correctly when he said the greatest commandment was to Love God, and the
second greatest was to Love our neighbor.
Matthew 22:36-39 "Teacher,
which is the greatest commandment in the Law?"
37Jesus replied: " 'Love the Lord your God
with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind.'
38This is the first and greatest
commandment.
39And the second is like it: 'Love your
neighbor as yourself.'
Jesus
also gave examples of lesser laws in tension with greater laws. For
example, he told the parable of the Good Samaritan, setting up the
situation where the laws kept the holy men from helping the man who
appeared to be dead and bloody. They didn’t want to become “unclean”.
They chose to obey the lesser law, whereas the Samaritan who had no regard
for the Levitical Law, did what was natural and helped the dying man.
Jesus asked, who was the one who loved his neighbor? The correct answer
was the Samaritan. When we disregard the lesser law to obey the greater
law, saving a person’s life, we act the part of the Good Samaritan. The
Jehovah’s Witnesses have turned the priority upside down, obeying a lesser
law (and that with the wrong understanding of the law).
CONCLUSION: These
laws were designed to keep people from pagan idolatry, not from medical
practices that actually help people, and have nothing
to do with idolatry.
MOST LIKELY, “BLOOD
SUCKING” ISN’T A TEMPTATION TO YOU, BUT WHAT IS?
IS THERE A LIFE LESSON FOR US IN LEVITICUS 17?
Focus: We must
be careful to give no devotion or allegiance to anything that competes
with God for our heart’s full devotion.
- MODERN “BLOOD
SUCKING”
- HORROR MOVIES or
BLOODY VIDEO GAMES
What are ways we disrespect
life? Maybe we are not eating the blood of living animals, but thriving
on the exciting bloodshed of video violence. Isn’t that an extreme
disrespect for life also? Doesn’t that also have it’s consequences? We
should refuse to watch horror and violence. Perhaps this is a cognitive
parallel to eating blood.
·
We tend to think of HUMAN SACRIFICES as ancient horrific
uncivilized practices. What about ABORTIONS? Isn’t that a human
sacrifice?
The pagans also used to offer human sacrifices to
appease these demon gods. It isn’t that they were stupid. It is that
they had real allegiances with real powers and did these horrific things
for spiritual favors from the gods, only they weren’t true gods, but
demons.
Is our culture more enlightened? Do we really know
better? What false gods do we serve? We offer babies aplenty…to the god
of free choice, to the god of sexual pleasure without responsibility for
that pleasure—we call it abortion, a woman’s right to choose. What about
the sacredness of life, and a child’s right to life? Let me assure you
that the pressure to watch and do as our culture does is JUST AS GREAT FOR
US AS IT WAS FOR THEM.
The warning for us from this passage isn’t about our
temptation to offer blood sacrifices and to drink blood. How many of you
are tempted there? I didn’t think so. In our culture today, that is not
the temptation to us. The real warning for us is to be faithful to our
Lord in all matters of purity, when our culture feeds us the counterfeits
that do tempt us. Here is the tricky part. IN a culture saturated with
counterfeits, it is difficult for some people to believe these
counterfeits are not good. Today there counterfeit spirituality in the
form of false systems of faith, there are counterfeit systems of
fulfillment, there are counterfeit lifestyle choices. Why do I call them
counterfeit? They promise a measure of satisfaction, but they are not
according to God’s design for our lives. If we follow God’s design we
will find lasting satisfaction. In fact, eternal satisfaction. The real
warning from Leviticus 17 is that something so abhorrent as drinking blood
had become a real temptation to many Israelites. When you are so
deceived, you don’t even recognize how abhorrent some behavior really is.
Can you think of a behavior that in your right mind, if you can stand back
objectively you can see how long term it can destroy you or is not good
for you, yet it still has a tempting allure. That’s the question of
loyalty you need to face this morning. Are you going to view it the way
God does, as something damaging and abhorrent, or the way the world does
as if it was no problem at all. The choice is up to you, but with all
choices there are consequences.
Modern Seductive Counterparts that Affect our Faithfulness
Leviticus 17:7 They must no
longer offer any of their sacrifices to the goat idols to whom they
prostitute themselves. This is to be a lasting ordinance for them and for
the generations to come.'
I want
you to note something here. This is God’s evaluation of the Israelites.
They were prostituting themselves. To what? Not to stone images, but to
real spiritual entities, demons. They had opened themselves up to the
demonic with their betrayal, their unfaithfulness. They who had said they
would be in covenant with God were breaching covenant. God, on his part
was forbidding the behavior of courting the demonic suitors.
Three Biblical Principles
1. Every person is serving God or gods in his
life.
2. Every person is transformed into an image
of his god.
3. Mankind creates and forms a structure of
society in its own image.
Compare Leviticus 17:7 with Jesus’ words.
Leviticus 17:7 They must no
longer offer any of their sacrifices to the goat idols to whom they
prostitute themselves. This is to be a lasting ordinance for them and for
the generations to come.'
Or with Jesus’ words…
Matthew 6:24
"No one can serve two masters. Either he will
hate the one and love the other, or he will be devoted to the one and
despise the other. You cannot serve both God and Money.
The
African proverb puts this same principle in this way,
"The man who tries to
walk two roads will split his pants."
God
doesn’t just want our PLEDGE of Allegiance, he really wants OUR
ALLEGIANCE. You cannot walk two roads.
Compare Leviticus 17:7 with James 4:4
James 4:4 You adulterous
people, don't you know that friendship with the world is hatred toward
God? Anyone who chooses to be a friend of the world becomes an enemy of
God.
Would you agree with me that a good friend is someone you are comfortable
being around? Here’s the problem. Christians are too comfortable with
the world. How does a Christian choose to be a friend of the world?
- When lust has become
your friend, God does not deliver you from it. Why? He doesn’t deliver
you from your friends, but from your enemies. First you must begin to
view “your friend” for what it is, the enemy of God!
- When gaining more and
more possessions is your comfortable friend. Watch out.
- When alcohol becomes
your comforting friend, the one you look forward to seeking out each
day, watch out.
- When you become very
comfortable laughing with, and being entertained by the entertainment of
this world, and when I say, “of this world” I mean outside God’s
parameters, watch out.
Many Christians have an intimate friendship with the
world, that is with the worldly lies, and cultural values that are not
Godly. It is a form of unfaithfulness to God that James calls adultery,
cheating, betrayal. Are you too comfortable around the filth of the world
that God abhors? Not only are you comfortable, but are you even attracted
to some of that filth?
Let me ask you some pointed questions. What do you
want? What do you believe will make you happy? Are you trying to make
yourself happy with in any way that is not pleasing to God? The ancient
pagan religions thought success, fulfillment, and happiness could be
enhanced with this abhorrent practice that included drinking blood. What
abhorrent practices have you dabbled with in your pursuit of success or
happiness?
Any practice that seems acceptable to you, but pulls
your heart’s devotion away from God fits into this category of
unfaithfulness. It is actually a modern form of idolatry. There is an
unseen enemy attempting to derail the built in desire you have to please
God. If he can fill it with a compulsion, or pleasure, or addiction to
replace or diminish that desire for God, he will do all he can to get you
pulled away, or distracted. He is the ruler of this world, and worldly
culture is still filled with behaviors that God finds horrific and people
do not.
When you live in a culture that doesn’t recognize
what repulses God, watch out! You will begin to say things like,
“What’s wrong with doing such n such, it’s not hurting anyone?” It’s
not? Oh really? It is hurting you in ways you can’t yet see or know.
Every aberration to God’s design is hurting somebody, and usually many “somebodies”,
if not immediately, it will down the line a bit. Remember the sermon on
the concept “No one is an Island?” Remember the dominoes. There is no
such thing as a secret, and there is no such thing as a harmless sin, or a
victimless sin.
Most likely, “Blood Sucking” isn’t a temptation to
you. But what does seduce you? What does tempt you? What pulls at your
heart to fill the voids with forbidden fulfillments? We need to be
reminded that the Israelites were so confused by the culture around them
that many of them bought into the pagan lie that tripped them up. The lie
said something like this, “Offering blood sacrifices on our own isn’t
going to hurt anything.” Or, “There’s nothing wrong with drinking blood,
my friend down the street swears it brings him all kinds of powers and
benefits to them. What can it hurt?” According to God, this degraded
life, so it was an offense to Him, after all, He created Life. Life is
pretty good stuff. God understands the gift of life, even if we haven’t
got a clue how it works. In the pagan culture, in some cases, animals
were being eaten while still alive much like wolves lapping at the blood
ravenously while it was still pumping it’s last fleeting beats of life.
Pagans, like these blood thirsty wolves, but this time not for physical
hunger and appetite but for spiritual appetites were eating flesh still
quivering with life, and drinking blood, still warm with life. The
fresher the better. This was a severe disrespect for life, and the
creator of life.
Let me assure you that the pressure to watch and do
as our culture does is great. Are you willing to stand up and be counted
as different for holiness properly understood? If many Jehovah’s
Witnesses are willing to sacrifice their own lives for a holiness
improperly understood, can we stand up under pressure for holiness
properly understood? In the language of God himself, it is all a matter
of choosing to be faithful to God, rather than prostituting ourselves to
our wrongfully trained appetites.
[2]
Life Application Study Bible
|